Skip to content
latestai.eulatestai.eu
F5

Fable 5.1

Previous-generation frontier Anthropic Claude model, referenced as a benchmark comparison for newer Opus releases.

UnverifiedLanguage ModelsModel

Updated EU status checked Last shown

Fable 5.1 at a glance

What is Fable 5.1?
Fable 5.1 is a model. Previous-generation frontier Anthropic Claude model, referenced as a benchmark comparison for newer Opus releases.
Does Fable 5.1 work in the EU?
Unverified. No explicit evidence found. Last verified 14 Nov 2026.
How much does Fable 5.1 cost?
Pricing unknown. Creators say it is more expensive than Opus 5.5; no exact pricing found.
Where was Fable 5.1 shown?
In 9 creator videos by Matthew Berman, AI Search, Matt Wolfe. Most recently by Matthew Berman on 10 Oct 2026, at 12:15 in “Everything has been solved”.

Sources: creator videos at the linked timestamps. EU status is information, not legal advice; see how we check.

About

Fable 5.1 appears to be an earlier frontier model from Anthropic. It is known here only through creator commentary, with no official page available. Creators describe it as the previous best Claude model, used as a comparison point when newer Opus 5.5 benchmarks were presented.

According to those videos, it is more expensive and more restrictive than Opus 5.5. Opus 5.5 reportedly beats it on most self-reported benchmarks, though Fable 5.1 ranks slightly higher on LiveBench. An Anthropic guest was said to describe it as suited to planning, code review and high-stakes security tasks. It was also reportedly used by Will Depue, alongside GPT-6 Pro, to categorize math discoveries by whether humans or AI made them.

Official details such as release date, context window, modalities, pricing and access routes could not be verified from the material provided, so those fields are left unknown. The vendor attribution rests on creator statements only.

Key features
  • Described as previous best Anthropic frontier model
  • Reportedly suited to planning, code review and security tasks
  • Ranks slightly above Opus 5.5 on LiveBench per creators
  • Used for categorizing math discoveries by human or AI origin
12 moments

As seen on YouTube

Watch the moment: the exact second top creators show it. Videos load only when you press play, via youtube-nocookie.com.

MA
Matt Wolfe4 Sept 2026
Live demo
AI News: The Most Insane Week So Far This Year!

New Anthropic model that topped benchmarks on release and still leads Artificial Analysis. Claimed 25% cheaper than Fable 5, but Artificial Analysis shows it as the most expensive per task ($3.69). The Megabonk clone looked good but cost about $120 and took 2 hours.

AI
AI Search3 Sept 2026
Live demo
Claude Fable 5.1 is savage

Anthropic's new top model, tested in Claude Code on 3D interior design, ray tracing, Blender, video creation, music and more. Strong on 3D, ray tracing and design, weaker on Blender, finding the frog, and tumor identification. Creator criticizes cost, slowness, usage limits and fallback to Opus 5 on biology prompts.

AI
AI Search3 Sept 2026
Claude Fable 5.1 is savage

Fable 5.1 without guardrails, not publicly available. Anthropic reports it designed lab-working protein binders, produced a higher-resolution Venus elevation map, and sped up biology models by up to 2.5x.

MA
Matt Wolfe3 Sept 2026
Live demo
Why Aren't People Talking About This Google Model?

Post-trained update of Fable 5 with fewer cybersecurity refusals, anti-distillation measures and unchanged $10/$50 per million token pricing. Tops Artificial Analysis (66 vs Opus 5's 63) but is the most expensive per task; the creator's Mega Bonk clone was excellent but cost about $114 in usage.

MA
Matthew Berman1 Sept 2026
Live demo
Anthropic went CRAZY (Mythos/Fable 5.1)

New Anthropic frontier model with the same per-token pricing as Fable 5 but a 75% cache-read price cut, claimed ~25% cheaper for typical workloads. Benchmarks improved (Terminal Bench Science, Cursor Bench, computer use, GDPval). Artificial Analysis found it scores 66 but costs more per task because it uses 1.7x output tokens. Creator's tests (landscape scenes, Rubik's cube, five websites, slides) were good but behind GPT 5.6 Soul.

Keep exploring

Similar AI tools

Closest neighbours by meaning, not just by category.