Benchmark from OpenAI (April 2025) testing a model's ability to read research papers and write code to replicate their results.

PaperBench
by OpenAI
OpenAI benchmark testing whether AI agents can replicate ICML 2024 papers from scratch, graded by hierarchical rubrics.
Updated EU status checked Last shown
PaperBench at a glance
- What is PaperBench?
- PaperBench is a research from OpenAI. OpenAI benchmark testing whether AI agents can replicate ICML 2024 papers from scratch, graded by hierarchical rubrics.
- Who makes PaperBench?
- PaperBench is made by OpenAI.
- Does PaperBench work in the EU?
- Available in the EU. PaperBench is an openly released benchmark with open-sourced code, so it can be used anywhere, including the EU. The provided pages show no region restrictions; the OpenAI EU pages only concern its commercial services. Last verified 14 Nov 2026.
- How much does PaperBench cost?
- Open source, open source. Evaluation code is open-sourced; running it requires compute and model API costs borne by the user.
- Where was PaperBench shown?
- In 1 creator video by Matthew Berman. Most recently by Matthew Berman on 10 Sept 2026, at 7:29 in “We need to talk about this...”.
Sources: creator videos at the linked timestamps. EU status is information, not legal advice; see how we check.
PaperBench is a benchmark from OpenAI, announced on 2 April 2025, that evaluates the ability of AI agents to replicate state-of-the-art AI research. Agents must replicate 20 ICML 2024 Spotlight and Oral papers from scratch, which involves understanding each paper's contributions, building a codebase, and running the experiments.
Each replication task is broken down into smaller sub-tasks with clear grading criteria, using rubrics co-developed with the authors of the original papers. In total the benchmark contains 8,316 individually gradable tasks. An LLM-based judge grades replication attempts against the rubrics, and a separate benchmark was created to assess the judge's accuracy.
In OpenAI's reported evaluation, the best-performing tested agent was Claude 3.5 Sonnet (New) with open-source scaffolding, with an average replication score of 21.0%. Top ML PhDs attempted a subset of the tasks, and the models did not yet outperform this human baseline. The code has been open-sourced to support research on the AI engineering capabilities of agents. It is a research evaluation harness, not a consumer product.
- 20 ICML 2024 Spotlight/Oral papers to replicate from scratch
- 8,316 individually gradable sub-tasks
- Hierarchical rubrics co-developed with the original paper authors
- LLM-based judge for automated grading, with its own judge benchmark
- Human ML PhD baseline for comparison
- Open-sourced evaluation code
As seen on YouTube
Watch the moment: the exact second top creators show it. Videos load only when you press play, via youtube-nocookie.com.
Similar AI tools
Closest neighbours by meaning, not just by category.
CORE-Bench
Research
Benchmark of 270 tasks testing whether AI agents can computationally reproduce results from scientific papers.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5
Research · Artificial Analysis
Artificial Analysis's aggregate benchmark index that scores language models on intelligence across multiple evaluations.
Agents Last Exam
Research
Benchmark of AI agents on long-horizon professional workflows across 55 sub-industries, led by Berkeley RDI.
SWE-bench Pro
Research
Benchmark from Scale AI testing AI agents on long-horizon software engineering tasks drawn from real codebases.
Nimble-v4
Model · Bespoke Labs
Decision models from Bespoke Labs that output multiple-choice, yes/no and rubric-score judgments.
Sage A1.5
Model · Alpha Innovator
35B mixture-of-experts open-weights agentic model for engineering, long-horizon search and scientific research.