Benchmark giving agents access to private company code for business-relevant changes. Top scores are under 40% (Fable 5.1 at 38.8%, GPT6 Astra 33.8%), with the top four statistically tied.
RealSWE at a glance
- What is RealSWE?
- RealSWE is a research. Benchmark of frontier AI models on private, real-world enterprise codebases, published by Specific.
- Does RealSWE work in the EU?
- Available in the EU. The leaderboard is a public website with no stated regional restrictions, so it is accessible from the EU/EEA; no explicit EU-specific statement was found. Last verified 14 Nov 2026.
- How much does RealSWE cost?
- Free. Public leaderboard website; no pricing listed.
- Where was RealSWE shown?
- In 1 creator video by AI Search. Most recently by AI Search on 13 Sept 2026, at 26:15 in “New Deepseek, human genome map, Navier Stokes, GPT finance, Suno v6, YuE2: AI NEWS”.
Sources: the vendor's own pages (linked above) and creator videos at the linked timestamps. EU status is information, not legal advice; see how we check.
Real-SWE (version 1.1, published by Specific) is a software-engineering benchmark that evaluates AI coding agents on private, enterprise codebases whose code and solutions are not available on the public internet. Tasks reflect work with business consequences, such as billing logic, tax calculations and customer migrations, often spanning multiple services.
Models are evaluated using their native harnesses, to reflect how enterprise engineers work in practice, so results measure model-and-harness combinations rather than models in isolation. The leaderboard reports resolution rate with one standard error either side, and a Pareto chart plots resolution rate against estimated cost per rollout.
On the leaderboard as scraped, Claude Opus 5.5 ranks first at 56.8%, followed by GPT 6 Astra (56.0%) and Gemini 4 Carbon (55.2%), with overlapping error bands among the top entries. The lowest of the 20 listed models scores 4.8%. A YouTube creator cited different, lower figures for an earlier version of the board, so scores vary by benchmark version. The page does not document the task count, methodology details or a public dataset.
- Tasks drawn from private enterprise codebases not available online
- Business-critical changes such as billing, taxes and customer migrations
- Native harnesses used per model, evaluating model-and-harness pairs
- Resolution rate reported with one standard error bounds
- Pareto chart of resolution rate versus estimated cost per rollout
- Leaderboard of 20 frontier models
As seen on YouTube
Watch the moment: the exact second top creators show it. Videos load only when you press play, via youtube-nocookie.com.
Similar AI tools
Closest neighbours by meaning, not just by category.
SWE-bench Pro
Research
Benchmark from Scale AI testing AI agents on long-horizon software engineering tasks drawn from real codebases.
DeepSWE
Research · Datacurve
Benchmark of frontier coding agents on original, long-horizon software engineering tasks, by Datacurve.
mini-SWE-agent
Library
Minimal open-source AI software engineering agent in about 100 lines of Python that uses only bash.
PaperBench
Research · OpenAI
OpenAI benchmark testing whether AI agents can replicate ICML 2024 papers from scratch, graded by hierarchical rubrics.
Exploit Gym
Research · OpenAI
OpenAI internal benchmark that tests whether AI agents can exploit software vulnerabilities in a sandbox.
SWE-2 Flash
Model · Cognition
Cognition's fast, efficient coding model, built for sub-agents handling delegated coding tasks.